Does the Pro-life Movement Help Mothers?
When people who kill children are considered heroes—of course, people who save children will be considered villains.
The pro-abortion movement doesn’t ignore babies: they murder them. The pro-life movement, however, protects babies and their mothers. As for the ridiculous claim that the pro-life movement needs to embrace essentially leftist or socialist causes in order to prove we’re authentically pro-life: no. One of the biggest myths about abortion today is that the pro-life... Continue Reading
Swimming with Sharks and Equality Vigilantes
Systemic, institutionally protected forms of robbery are forms of legal theft which break no laws, yet distort principles of just ownership.
We should acknowledge differences, advantages, and imbalances, and strive to help those who are less fortunate. But we should not consider inequality an inherent obscenity. It is a base sort of spirit who says: “Because everyone [or, more often, because I] cannot enjoy that, no one should.” Thieves are typically pegged under one of two... Continue Reading
Won’t Get Fooled Again
After the pandemic, Americans should never let public-health authorities deprive them of their liberties.
[The public] assumed that the Centers for Disease Control knew how to control disease and that scientists and public-health officials would provide sound scientific guidance about public health. Those were reasonable assumptions. They just turned out to be wrong. More than a century ago, Mark Twain identified two fundamental problems that would prove relevant... Continue Reading
Truth, Love, and The Definition of “Inclusion”
Today’s cultural understanding of “inclusion” rejects normalcy as oppressive and even bigoted.
Do not advance the lie. Do not agree to the lie. Once you give into the lie, you become defenseless to it and its insatiable demands. It has you in its grip and will not let you go. “Inclusion” is a word that’s often cited as a motivator supporting the decisions and developments taking... Continue Reading
The Three Worlds of Evangelicalism Debate
Culture’s view of Christianity and its moral systems have changed over the last three decades.
Is it really the case that the culture’s view of Christianity and its moral systems are still basically the same as they were three decades ago, and that there was no major cultural break around 2014? I would argue No. There is very strong evidence for such a cultural break. My First Things article... Continue Reading
‘Evangelicals,’ the ‘Christian’ Putin, and the War in Ukraine: A Response to Mindy Belz
As a whole the people of Ukraine are nearly as conservative on social issues as are the people of Russia.
…the war [between Russia and Urkraine has been cast] in terms of good versus evil, with Ukraine’s true believers on one side, and the fake Christian Putin on the other. Personally, I am much more skeptical about the genuine faith of some evangelicals that have tethered themselves to politicians that for decades have kept us... Continue Reading
The First Commentator to Plead His Case
Sometimes we can get ourselves stuck in a presumption that the experts are always right.
There is a sense in which commentaries are one form of New Testament prophecy, in that they proclaim the word of God. We ought to test them, every one. Hang on to whatever is good, helpful, and true in them. Reject whatever is false, misleading, or evil in them. But you’ll limit your ability to do... Continue Reading
Every School is a Religious School
Every school has a creed, expressed or implied.
In education, the words secular, government, and public are not synonymous with neutrality. A public school is every bit as enmeshed in a system of ardently held, worldview-shaping religio-philosophical underpinnings as any religious school out there. It is not neutral because it is not possible to be neutral. The claim that every school is intrinsically... Continue Reading
Should the Visible Church, as an Institution, Form and Express an Opinion on Political Violence?
Has Jesus Christ, as the only head of the church, authorized his church to make such statements?
Presbyteries, as an institution of the covenant of grace, do well to remember the limits of their competence and authority and to remember the Christian liberty of their members to disagree with the cultural, poltical, social, and economic opinions of her ministers and ruling elders. According to the PCA’s denominational magazine, By Faith, the Potomac Presbytery... Continue Reading
Endorse Religious Liberty
The Supreme Court has a chance to make clear that the Constitution does not permit, let alone require, the government to discriminate against expressions of faith.
Despite reiterating, in case after case, that the Constitution demands government neutrality toward religion, the Court has stubbornly failed to clear away an undergrowth of older precedents that arguably suggest the opposite. Bureaucrats and judges alike cling to these outdated precedents, using them to mask their confusion, ignorance, or outright animus toward religious believers and... Continue Reading
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- …
- 1270
- Next Page »